Victim's mother: Heed high court, give juvenile offenders shot at reform

Twenty-one years ago, a 17-year-old youth kidnapped my 15-year-old son, Jeremy Drake. Within hours, my son had been shot to death in a park in northeast Omaha. That youth, Jeremy Herman, and a 19-year-old were later convicted and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

My son was a kind and compassionate child. He was a good student; he worked hard and had many friends. He earned his own money to buy a guitar. At 15, he was already an accomplished musician. As the oldest child in a single-parent home, he took on many responsibilities helping me and his younger three siblings.

Read more

Join us in promoting safe communities

The Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth is a member of the National Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Coalition, a collaboration of many organizations working together to develop consensus on federal youth policy. We hope you will join with us in promoting safe communities.

As we continue to work to replace life without parole sentences for youth and other extreme sentences with age-appropriate accountability that focuses on rehabilitation and reentry into society, these recommendations include a number of specific points that could help to further transform sentencing practices. Please consider further engaging as suggested below by the coalition.

Members of the NJJDPC steering committee and task force chairs will deliver these to President Obama, key contacts at OMB, DOJ (OJP and OJJDP), Ed and HHS.

NJJDP Coalition Recommendations-Promoting Safe Communities 02-13-13

2013 Juvenile Justice Week of Faith and Healing to be observed March 4-10

What began as an idea to engage more faith leaders in issues of youth justice in California has grown into an annual week-long observance that has spread throughout the United States and is now known as the Juvenile Justice Week of Faith and Healing.

Javier Stauring, Co-Director of the Office of Restorative Justice at the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles, started the observance in an effort to raise awareness of individual, community, and social needs arising from the current juvenile justice system. Events during the week also include dialogues between offenders, victims, and the community regarding the causes of crime.

“Through education, advocacy, and direct service projects,” Stauring’s Healing Justice Coalition explains, “participating religious congregations, high schools and universities will take leadership roles to stop the cycle of pain and hurt in our communities with a restorative model of justice.” Past projects have ranged from the installation of mock jail cells on university campuses and developing an advocacy effort to help students understand the physical reality of prison, to organized visits for members of clergy to juvenile prison facilities.

Juvenile Justice Week of Faith and Healing will be observed March 4-10 this year. In 2012, Esi Mathis of California was among the members of the National Family Network who undertook projects for that week. Esi sent letters to ministers in her community and held meetings with parishioners about the practice of sentencing children to life without parole. This year she plans to follow up with the ministers who didn’t respond last year and to reach out to new ministers as well.

To get involved in events in your area, or if you know a faith leader or community who may be interested, please visit the Healing Justice Coalition website or check out the CFSY Faith Outreach Toolkit. For more information, please contact CFSY Outreach Coordinator Emily Dillon at [email protected] or 202-289-4673.

Making Miller meaningful in 2013

The new year is off to an exciting start as legislatures and courts throughout the country react to the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Miller v. Alabama banning mandatory life without parole for youth. We are closely tracking these developments and working in partnership with attorneys, advocates and others in the states to advance meaningful legislation, defeat harmful bills and strategically use legal decisions to advance broader reforms. We are expanding the coalition of organizations partnering in our cause and are continuing to raise the profile of the issue through our communications work so that the movement to scale back extreme sentences for youth can move forward as cohesively and strategically as possible.

The Miller decision helped to establish a new era for the ways that we hold children accountable for the harm that they have caused. It is the fourth Supreme Court ruling in eight years that identifies youth status as a relevant factor when children face the justice system. But as we anticipated, some state policymakers have responded to the landmark opinion by introducing legislation that would ignore both the letter and spirit of Miller. A handful of state legislatures are considering more comprehensive approaches. As state advocates look to take the Miller decision from paper to practice, they look to us for guidance.

Only two states – Pennsylvania and North Carolina – have passed legislation post-Miller. The laws are a step forward but do not go far enough. Both have abolished life without parole for children convicted of some crimes but keep death-in-prison sentences on the books for others.

We know it will be an uphill battle to convince legislators that they need to approach Miller-related sentencing reforms holistically and thoughtfully, rather than simply replacing mandatory life without parole with other harsh sentences. We will need to demonstrate to policymakers the broad support that exists for reform from partners like, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which recently endorsed our principles as our newest official supporter. If your organization is interested in signing on to our statement of principles as an official supporter, please contact us at [email protected].
If you want specific information regarding activity in your state, please contact LaShunda Hill at [email protected].

While the efforts to create real reform heat up in the state legislatures, lawyers are simultaneously working in courts to turn the words of both Miller and Graham v. Florida into concrete changes in the lives of people facing the possibility of spending the rest of their lives in prison for crimes that took place when they were children.

Judges around the country are grappling with a variety of legal issues and are trying to figure out exactly how these decisions affect people already serving this sentence as well as the youth currently charged with crimes where the sentence is a possibility. Some judges have decided that the Supreme Court ruling is intended to be far-reaching, making young people who have previously received the sentence eligible for parole consideration. Meanwhile, lawyers are coordinating their litigation strategies and building their skills in advance of any resentencing opportunities created by Miller. We are working with attorneys to share information and ensure that litigation and legislative efforts are coordinated so that litigation-based reform efforts have the best possible chances for success.

We are pleased to announce that we will begin a series of webinars and other presentations by experts in fields that will be relevant to Miller resentencings, such as trauma, institutional disciplinary history, re-entry, and adolescent development. If you are an attorney representing someone potentially affected by the Miller decision and are interested in our litigators’ calls or our webinar series, please contact our litigation specialist, John Hardenbergh, at [email protected].

Finally, be sure to check out our new website. It is designed to be more user friendly while highlighting important news and information. In our resource section, you can find a map of state policies, tool kits, and state and national reports about life without parole for youth. The website offers many opportunities for engagement and provides a primer on the Supreme Court cases most relevant to our work.

This past year saw so much forward progress in our efforts to establish fair sentences for youth. Together, we will ensure that extreme sentences are replaced with age-appropriate laws and policies that focus on rehabilitation and reintegration into society. We look forward to working with you in 2013!

In solidarity,
Jody Kent Lavy

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops supports end to life without parole for children

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has endorsed the principles of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth. The USCCB is “an assembly of the hierarchy of the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands who jointly exercise certain pastoral functions on behalf of the Christian faithful of the United States.” It is comprised of 454 active and retired Catholic bishops who lead Dioceses and Archdioceses throughout the country.

Press Release: Catholic Bishops call for end to life without parole for youth - January 2013

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops today announced that it has endorsed the principles of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth. The USCCB is ” is an assembly of the hierarchy of the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands who jointly exercise certain pastoral functions on behalf of the Christian faithful of the United States.” It is comprised of 454 active and retired Catholic bishops who lead Dioceses and Archdioceses throughout the country.

The full text of the news release follows.

DATE:           January 30, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

BISHOPS’ COMMITTEE JOINS CALL TO END LIFE SENTENCES WITHOUT PAROLE FOR CHILDREN

 

WASHINGTON – A committee of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has endorsed the principles of a national campaign to end the practice of sentencing people under the age of 18 to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The USCCB Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development agreed to endorse the Statement of Principles for the Fair Sentencing of Youth at their December 2012 meeting.

“While there is no question that violent and dangerous youth need to be confined for their safety and that of society, the USCCB does not support provisions that treat children as though they are equal to adults in their moral and cognitive development,” said Bishop Stephen E. Blaire of Stockton, California, chairman of the committee. “Life sentences without parole eliminate the opportunity for rehabilitation or second chances.”

In their 2000 document, “Responsibility, Rehabilitation, and Restoration: A Catholic Perspective on Crime and Criminal Justice,” the bishops wrote, “Placing children in adult jail is a sign of failure, not a solution.”

More than 100 organizations have endorsed the Statement of Principles of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, including a diverse array of faith-based organizations such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, the General Synod of the United Church of Christ, the United Methodist Church, the Muslim Public Affairs Council and the Jewish Council on Urban Affairs. Supporters also include groups representing law enforcement officials, victims’ families, mental health experts, parents, teachers and child welfare advocates.

“We welcome the opportunity to partner with USCCB, a national leader defending the rights of our most vulnerable,” said Jody Kent Lavy, director of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth. “We support the Church’s efforts to promote the greater good by ensuring that children are held accountable for the harm that they have caused in age-appropriate ways that uphold their human dignity and focus on rehabilitation and reintegration into society.”

The federal government and 38 states allow youth convicted of a crime to be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. Currently, over 2,500 youth are serving life sentences without the possibility of parole. African American youth are sentenced to life without parole as children at a per capita rate that is 10 times that of white youth convicted of the same crimes. The United States is the only country that imposes this sentence upon children.

Can forgiveness play a role in criminal justice?

By Paul Tullis, The New York Times, January 4, 2013

At 2:15 in the afternoon on March 28, 2010, Conor McBride, a tall, sandy-haired 19-year-old wearing jeans, a T-shirt and New Balance sneakers, walked into the Tallahassee Police Department and approached the desk in the main lobby. Gina Maddox, the officer on duty, noticed that he looked upset and asked him how she could help. “You need to arrest me,” McBride answered. “I just shot my fiancée in the head.” When Maddox, taken aback, didn’t respond right away, McBride added, “This is not a joke.”

Read More

State court overturns 110 year sentence for teen gunman

SAN FRANCISCO —

The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a sentence of 110 years to life in prison for a man who committed three attempted murders at age 16 is unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment.

The court said a sentence that exceeds a juvenile’s expected life span is equivalent to life in prison without possibility of parole and violates a 2010 Supreme Court decision.

In the 2010 ruling, the federal high court said it is unconstitutional for juveniles who commit crimes that are not murders to be sentenced to life without parole. The U.S. court said such youths must be given a realistic opportunity to seek parole.

Read more

Bill would give juvenile lifers a second chance

08-16) 11:41 PDT San Francisco — Offenders serving life-without-parole sentences for crimes they committed as juveniles would have a chance to get out of prison under a bill approved Thursday by the state Assembly.

The bill, which now heads back to the Senate, passed the Assembly with the minimum of 41 votes and no Republican support. It was the third time in as many years that the lower house considered some form of the proposal by San Francisco Democratic Senator Leland Yee.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Bill-would-give-juvenile-lifers-a-second-chance-3793528.php#ixzz23kaECEOW